BIA HOLDS THAT, IN ADJUDICATING AN APPLICATION PER 8 CFR § 1292.2(a) FOR RECOGNITION AS A NON-PROFIT OR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION PROVIDING LOW-COST OR FREE LEGAL REPRESENTATION, THE BOARD WILL NOT RULE FAVORABLY… CONTINUE
LRIS Helps San Francisco Immigration Court
The LRIS (Lawyer Referral and Information Service) of the Bar Association of San Francisco has been helping the San Francisco Immigration Court for over two and a half decades. The… CONTINUE
California Assembly
California Assembly Bill (AB) 60 (Chapter 524: Statutes of 2013) requires the Department of Motor Vehicle to issue an original driver license to an applicant who is unable to submit… CONTINUE
BIA DISTINGUISHES Moncrieffe v. Holder, REAFFIRMS Matter of Davey IN HOLDING THAT, TO DETERMINE REMOVABILITY UNDER INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i), THE IJ SHOULD USE A CIRCUMSTANCE-SPECIFIC INQUIRY INTO THE CHARACTER OF THE RESPONDENT’S CONDUCT ON A SINGLE OCCASION, NOT A CATEGORICAL INQUIRY INTO THE ELEMENTS OF A SINGLE CRIME.
On September 18, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), in an extensive opinion, overturned the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ), holding that the U.S. Supreme Court case of… CONTINUE
BIA HOLDS THAT ONE CONVICTED UNDER INA § 212(a)(2)(B) OF TWO OR MORE OFFENSES FOR WHICH THE AGGREGATE SENTENCES WERE FIVE YEARS OR MORE IS INELIGIBLE FOR CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL FOR NONPERMANENT RESIDENTS PER INA §240A(b)(1)(C).
On September 23, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), dismissing an appeal and reinstating a grant of voluntary departure, held that the language of INA § 240A(b)(1)(C)—which makes ineligible… CONTINUE
BIA FURTHER INTERPRETS Moncrieffe v. Holder, CITES Matter of Chairez IN HOLDING THAT WHERE A STATE CRIMINAL STATUTE IS BROADER THAN THE ANALAGOUS FEDERAL GENERIC DEFINITION, A RESPONDENT MUST STILL SHOW A REALISTIC PROBABILITY THAT THE STATE LAW WOULD BE APPLIED TO CONDUCT FALLING OUTSIDE THE GENERIC CRIME.
On September 22, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), in parsing a Connecticut drug conviction’s effect on removability, noted that at the relevant time the state law included two… CONTINUE
BIA HOLDS CALIFORNIA CONVICTION FOR MALICIOUS VANDALISM WITH GANG ENHANCEMENT QUALIFIES AS CIMT.
On September 12, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), finding that a conviction for malicious vandalism under California Penal Code § 594(a) involves damage or destruction to the property… CONTINUE
BIA HOLDS THAT ONE ADMITTED AT A PORT OF ENTRY AS A CONDITIONAL RESIDENT IS ASSIMILATED TO THE STATUS OF AN APPLICANT “LAWFULLY ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE” AND THEREFORE BARRED FROM WAIVER ELIGIBILITY UNDER INA § 212(h) IF SUBSEQUENTLY CONVICTED OF AN AGGRAVATED FELONY.
On September 17, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) prior decision that one convicted of an aggravated felony after admission at a port of… CONTINUE
BIA HOLDS FLORIDA CRIMINAL CONVICTION FOR SALE
BIA HOLDS FLORIDA CRIMINAL CONVICTION FOR SALE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE, WHERE STATUTE LACKS MENS REA REQUIREMENT REGARDING ILLICIT NATURE OF THE SUBSTANCE BUT REQUIRES KNOWLEDGE OF ITS PRESENCE AND INCLUDES… CONTINUE
BIA HOLDS FALSE TESTIMONY OUTSIDE OF THREE-YEAR GOOD MORAL CHARACTER PERIOD DOES NOT BAR GRANT OF SPECIAL RULE CANCELLATION OF REMOVAL REQUEST.
On August 5, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) found that the three-year time frame during which a special rule cancellation of removal applicant must show good moral character… CONTINUE
