There is some prosecutorial discretion given to the DHS attorneys when it comes to the deportation process. If they look at the Notice To Appear and feel that there is… CONTINUE
How a Person May End Up in Immigration Court
How a person ends up in immigration court in front of an Immigration Judge can be either voluntary or involuntary. “Involuntary” generally means that that you have done something wrong… CONTINUE
How Can I Get Political Asylum in the U.S.?
There are two ways to get political asylum: The main path is not through the deportation process, but is what is called an “affirmative filing” for political asylum. This is… CONTINUE
Deportation or Exclusion Proceedings
A removal proceeding is just another word for deportation or exclusion proceedings. It is presided over by an Immigration Judge (IJ). These are not Article 3 state or federal judges,… CONTINUE
Deferred Action: Deportation
Deferred Action is a hands-off policy that the government maintains towards a particular individual under the belief that given the totality of circumstances surrounding him or her, it is best to… CONTINUE
Prosecutorial Discretion in Deportation
Because the government has limited resources to deport people who are in the U.S. illegally, it has come up with the concept of Prosecutorial Discretion (PD). Under PD, a judgment… CONTINUE
Deportation: What to Expect – The Removal Process
Deportation as a standalone concept ended in 1997 and currently the process is called “removal.” But the terms, in general, are used interchangeably, although an experienced attorney will know how… CONTINUE
BIA Holds Immigration Judge Should Grant A Continuance to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) So That DHS Can Effect Proper Service Of A Notice to Appear (NTA) That Was Defectively Served Pursuant To The Regulations Governing The Service of Minors Under 14.
On December 16, 2016 the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) issued a decision in a case where the Immigration Judge (IJ) had terminated removal proceedings against a minor… CONTINUE
BIA Holds Asylum Application Frivolous Because Respondent Falsely Postdated His Date Of Entry (DOE) By More Than Two years And DOE Is a Material Element In Deciding Asylum Eligibility, Distinguishing Prior Third Circuit Precedent. Matter OF X-M-C-, 25 I&N Dec. 322 (BIA 2010) Followed.
On December 12, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) issued a decision in an appeal of a removal order by one found by the Immigration Judge (IJ)… CONTINUE
BIA Holds An INA §237(a)(1)(H) Fraud Waiver Does Not Waive Removability Under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(i) For Conviction Of Crime Involving Moral Turpitude, Even Where Conviction Based On Underlying Fraud.
On November 1, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) addressed the issue of whether an INA §237(a)(1)(H) waiver can waive removability under INA §237(a)(2)(i) for conviction of… CONTINUE
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- …
- 38
- Next Page »