BIA Holds That An Immigration Judge May Find A Document To Be Fraudulent Without Forensic Analysis Or Other Expert Testimony Where The Document Contains Obvious Defects Or Readily Identifiable Hallmarks… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That The Risk Of Harm To A Child Required To Obtain A Conviction For Child Neglect In The Second Degree Under §163.54(1) Of the Oregon Revised Statutes Is… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Expert Testimony is Evidence, But Only An Immigration Judge Makes Factual Findings. When The Immigration Judge Makes A Factual Finding That Is Not Consistent With An Expert’s… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Where One Who Was Previously Present In The U.S. Without Being Admitted Or Parole Has His Or Her Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Terminated, He Or She Remains… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Attorney’s Acceptance Of Responsibility For Error Does Not Discharge The Disciplinary Authority Complaint Obligation Under Matter Of Lozada, 19 I&N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), Particularly Where The… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That, Absent A Showing Of Prejudice On Account Of Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel, Or A Showing That Clearly Undermines The Validity And Finality Of The Finding, It Is… CONTINUE

ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDS THAT THE PERSECUTOR BAR TO ELIGIBILITY FOR ASYLUM AND WITHHOLDING OF REMOVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE AN EXCEPTION FOR COERCION OR DURESS. DHS DOES NOT HAVE AN EVIDENTIARY… CONTINUE

On October 30, 2020, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) dismissed the appeal of an I-130 petitioner who sought to classify her husband as her Immediate Relative spouse…. CONTINUE