On December 9, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) dismissed the appeal of a respondent who had been convicted of marijuana possession and charged with aggravated assault… CONTINUE
BIA Holds That A Witness Testifying About Events He Or She Has Experienced Has Personal Knowledge Of The Matters Addressed And The Federal Rules Of Evidence Requirements Regarding The Admission Of Expert And Lay Testimony Do Not Apply. Additionally, Conduct By An Immigration Judge (IJ) That Is Bullying Or Hostile To A Witness Is Inappropriate, Particularly When It Involves A Minor, And May Result In A Remand To a New IJ.
On November 23, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) vacated a decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying a 15 year-old’s request for withholding of removal and… CONTINUE
BIA Holds That For Purposes OF NACARA Special Rule Cancellation, Continuous Physical Presence Is Measured From The Respondent’s Most Recently Incurred Ground Of Removal, At Least If That Ground Is Set Forth In 8 CFR § 1240.66(c)(1).
On December 2, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) decided how to calculate continuous physical presence for special rule cancellation of removal under NACARA where a respondent… CONTINUE
BIA Holds That In Immigration Proceedings, Neither Party Bears A Formal Burden Of Proof To Establish The Respondent Is Mentally Competent, But Where Indications Of Incompetency Are Apparent, The Immigration Judge Should Determine If Competency Is Proved By A Preponderance Of The Evidence, A Finding Of Fact The Board Reviews Under A Clearly Erroneous Standard.
On November 2, 2015 the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) “set forth a framework for allocation of the burden of proof for mental competency issues raised in immigration… CONTINUE
BIA Holds The Voluntary Return of a Respondent Who Has The Right To A Hearing Before An Immigration Judge Does Not Break Continuous Physical Presence For Purposes Of Cancellation of Removal Per INA § 240A(b)(1)(A) In The Absence Of Evidence He Or She Knew Of And Waived The Right To Such A Hearing, Following Matter of Castrejon-Colino, 26 I.&N. Dec. 667 (BIAQ 2015).
On October 28, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board), in a companion case to Matter of Castrejon-Colino, 26 I.&N. Dec 667 (BIA 2015), held again that evidence… CONTINUE
BIA Holds The Voluntary Return Of A Respondent Who Has The Right To A Hearing Before An Immigration Judge Does Not Break Continuous Physical Presence For Purposes Of Cancellation Of Removal Per INA §240A(b)(1)(A) In The Absence Of Evidence He Or She Knew Of And Waived The Right To Such A Hearing, Clarifying Matter Of Avilez, 23 I.&N. Dec. 799 (BIA 2005).
On October 28, 2015, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sustained the appeal of an Immigration Court removal order. The Immigration Judge (IJ) had pretermitted the applicant’s request… CONTINUE
Green Card Self-Petitioning Versus The “PERM” Process
There are the exceptions to the rule that you generally need a sponsor to allow you to get a green card: Individuals who are some of the few, at the… CONTINUE
Labor Certification
Q: Is the Labor Certification part of the H-1B? What type of a Visa is that? A: It’s to help the person get a Green Card. So, there are subcategories… CONTINUE
BIA Holds Immigration Judge Can Use Significant Similarities Between Claims Filed in Separate Proceedings to Make an Adverse Credibility Determination if a Three-Part Framework is Followed.
BIA HOLDS IMMIGRATION JUDGE CAN USE SIGNIFICANT SIMILARITIES BETWEEN CLAIMS FILED IN SEPARATE PROCEEDINGS TO MAKE AN ADVERSE CREDIBILITY DETERMINATION IF A THREE-PART FRAMEWORK IS FOLLOWED. On September 8, 2015,… CONTINUE
PERM Labor Certification
The general population of employers must usually use a system called “Labor Certification,” or PERM Labor Certification to sponsor a person for a green card, and that is a pretty… CONTINUE
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- …
- 31
- Next Page »
