• Employers
    • Permanent Visas
      • PERM Labor Certifications
    • Temporary Visas
      • E-3 Visas
      • H-1B Employment
        • H-1B1 Visa
      • L-1 Visas
      • J-1 Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • TN, Canadian/Mexican
  • Employees
    • Nonimmigrant Visa Applications (Consular)
    • National Interest Waivers
  • Entrepreneurs
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
  • Compliance
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Family & Individuals
    • Marriage
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Naturalization
    • Students
      • STEM OPT Visas
  • About Us
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Attorneys
      • Philip M. Levin, Founder
      • Don L. Pangilinan, Principal
      • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
      • Alexandra Cotroneo, Associate

Levin and Pangilinan PC

U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law

¿Necesitas el sitio web en español?

800.974.2691
Contact Us
  • Employers
    • Permanent Visas
      • PERM Labor Certifications
    • Temporary Visas
      • E-3 Visas
      • H-1B Employment
        • H-1B1 Visa
      • L-1 Visas
      • J-1 Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • TN, Canadian/Mexican
  • Employees
    • Nonimmigrant Visa Applications (Consular)
    • National Interest Waivers
  • Entrepreneurs
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
  • Compliance
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Family & Individuals
    • Marriage
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Naturalization
    • Students
      • STEM OPT Visas
  • About Us
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Attorneys
      • Philip M. Levin, Founder
      • Don L. Pangilinan, Principal
      • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
      • Alexandra Cotroneo, Associate

BIA Holds That In Removal Proceedings Which Involve Issues Of A Respondent’s Mental Competency, The Immigration Judge Has Discretion To Consider And Apply Safeguards To Allow The Case To Go Forward And The Board Reviews The Adequacy Of The Judge’s Decision De Novo.

July 20, 2016 Philip Levin

On June 29, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) ruled on the DHS appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) termination of removal proceedings without prejudice, where the… CONTINUE

Filed Under: BIA

BIA Holds One Cannot Establish Good Moral Character Per INA §101(f)(6) If, During The Required Period, He or She Gives False Testimony Under Oath In Immigration Court Intending To Obtain An Immigration Benefit.

July 10, 2016 Philip Levin

On June 27, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) held that a Mexican citizen who knowingly lied about his criminal history before the Immigration Judge (IJ) in… CONTINUE

Filed Under: BIA

BIA Holds That The “Material Support Bar” Of INA 212§(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) Contains No Implied Exception For The Provision Of Material Support To A Terrorist Organization While Under Duress And, Absent A Waiver, One Who Affords Such Support Is Inadmissible And Statutorily Barred From Establishing Eligibility For Asylum, Withholding Of Removal, Or CAT Relief.

June 27, 2016 Philip Levin

On June 9, 2016 the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board), in a decision on remand from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, held that there is no duress… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

BIA Holds That the Circumstance – Specific Approach Is Properly Applied When Analyzing The “Domestic” Nature of An Offense To Determine Whether The Conviction Is For A Crime Of Domestic Violence Under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i). The Board Also Holds That Where A Respondent’s Original Sentence Documentation Is Ambiguous As To Whether He Was Sentenced To Probation Or A Probated Term Of Imprisonment, DHS Must Give Effect To A Clarification Order Issued By The Sentencing Judge To Determine If Respondent Was Sentenced To A Term Of Imprisonment Of At Least 1 Year And Thus Was Convicted Of An Aggravated Felony Crime Of Violence Under INA §101(a)(43)(F).

May 29, 2016 Philip Levin

On May 27, 2016 the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sought to determine the process for considering whether a conviction for simple battery in Georgia, a categorical crime… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

BIA Holds That, Within The Jurisdiction Of The Ninth Circuit, An Arizona Conviction For Solicitation To Posses Marijuana For Sale Is A Conviction For A Crime Involving Moral Turpitude That Establishes A Defendant’s Inadmissibility Under INA §212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) And, Because This Is “An Offense Identified In Section §212(a)(2),” The Defendant Is Properly Considered An Arriving Alien Under INA §101(a)(13)(C)(v). Matter of Vo, 25 I&N Dec. 426 (BIA 2011) Clarified.

May 21, 2016 Philip Levin

On May 19, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (BIA or Board) dismissed the appeal of a respondent who was convicted of solicitation to possess marijuana for sale, an Arizona… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

BIA Holds That In Determining Whether A Conviction Qualifies As An Aggravated Felony Under INA 101(a)(43)(T), The Categorical Approach Applies To Decide If the Offense Involves 1) A Failure To Appear 2) Before A Court, But The Circumstance – Specific Approach Applies to Decide If Such Failure was 1) Pursuant To A Court Order 2) To Answer To Or Dispose Of A Felony Charge 3) For Which A Sentence Of 2 Years Imprisonment Or More May Be Imposed.

May 10, 2016 Philip Levin

On May 5, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sustained a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appeal in holding that a respondent’s conviction of a federal failure… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

BIA Holds That Sibling-To-Sibling DNA Test Results Showing At Least A 99.5% Degree Of Certainty That A Full Sibling Relationship Exists Should Be Accepted By USCIS And Considered To Be Probative Evidence Of The Claimed Relationship.

April 15, 2016 Philip Levin

On March 29, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) ruled on the evidentiary value of direct sibling-to-sibling DNA test results (as opposed to parent-child results for each… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

BIA Holds That A Failure To Appear To Serve A Sentence Aggravated Felony Offense Under INA § 101 (a)(43)(Q) Merely Requires That The Underlying Offense Be “Punishable By” Imprisonment For A Term Of 5 Years Or More, Regardless Of The Sentence Respondent Is Actually Ordered To Serve.

March 21, 2016 Philip Levin

On March 17, 2016, The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) ruled on the appeal of a respondent convicted of possessing stolen mailbox keys, a Federal felony punishable by… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Aggravated Felony, Appeal, Blog, Failure to Appear, Felony Case, Penalty, Sentence, U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Tagged With: Mailbox Keys, Theft

BIA Holds It Has Jurisdiction To Determine Whether An Appellant Was Eligible For Previous Grant Of Adjustment Of Status Under The Legalization Provisions of INA § 245A(b)(1) For Purposes Of Determining Both Removability And Eligibility For Relief From Removal.

March 18, 2016 Philip Levin

On March 10, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) found that one who, after obtaining temporary residence status through the legalization program, was convicted of multiple controlled… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Adjustment Of Status, Blog

BIA Holds That A State Crime Conviction Only Qualifies As An Aggravated Felony Crime Of Violence Under 18 U.S.C. 16(a) If It Requires As An Element The Use, Attempted Use, Or Threatened Use Of Violent Physical Force. Because Aggravated Battery In The Third Degree Under Article 122 Of The Puerto Rico Penal Code May Be Committed By Means That Do Not Require The Use Of Violent Physical Force, It Is Not Categorically A Crime Of Violence Per 18 U.S.C. 16(a). Matter of Martin, 23 I&N Dec. 491(BIA 2002) Withdrawn.

February 26, 2016 Philip Levin

On February 24, 2016, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) considered the appeal of a respondent convicted of third degree aggravated battery under Article 122 of the Puerto… CONTINUE

Filed Under: Blog

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • …
  • 31
  • Next Page »

Contact Us

Recent Blog Posts

  • U.S. Visa Interview Waiver Program: Important 2025 Updates
  • New DOS Guidance on Mandating Social Media Review of all F-1, M-1, and J-1 visa applicants and Possible Revocations: What You Need to Know
  • H-1B LOTTERY FY 2026 AND THE RECENT MODERNIZATION RULE 
  • Birthright Citizenship Under Fire: Trump’s Latest Executive Order Explained
  • BIA Holds That Its Prior Holding In Matter Of Fernandes, 28 I&N Dec. 605 (BIA 2022), That An Objection To A Noncompliant Notice To Appear Will Generally Be Considered Timely If Raised Prior To The Close Of Pleadings Is Not A Change In Law, And Thus Matter Of Fernandes Applies Retroactively.

Practice Areas

  • Business Immigration
  • Family Immigration
  • Marriage
  • PERM Labor Certification
  • Hearing & Appeals
  • Deportation, Removal, Asylum
  • I-9/Worksite Enforcement

LEAVE A REVIEW

Leave a Review on Google

        

San Francisco Office
930 Montgomery Street
Suite 502
San Francisco, CA 94133

Silicon Valley Office
5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Los Angeles Office
445 S. Figueroa Street
Suites 2600 & 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071
©2025 Levin and Pangilinan PC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Business Immigration
  • Family Immigration
  • Labor Certification
  • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Hearings & Appeals
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · XML Sitemap · Sitemap

R-1
TN

The TN nonimmigrant classification allows qualified Canadian and Mexican citizens to enter the U.S. and engage in professional business activities. LPPC will help you navigate through the TN application process by evaluating your eligibility, preparing supporting documentation for your application, and ultimately filing your application. 

B-1

LPPC will guide you through the consular process to receive a B-1 visa for specific short-term business purposes ranging from contract negotiations to seminars and conferences.

O-1

O-1 visas are for persons of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business or sports. 

J-1

Administered by the Department of State, the J-1 visa is for students, trainees, academics, researchers, professionals or experts participating in an approved Exchange Visitor program. LPPC will assist you and your sponsor with preparing the necessary paperwork and the consular process so you can begin your program at ease. 

E-1 & E-2

E-1 visas and E-2 visas are for nationals of countries with which the United States has a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation (FCN) or bilateral investment treaty (BIT). If you are a nonimmigrant trader or investor seeking to conduct business operations or develop a new enterprise in the U.S., we will help you file for the appropriate visa. As a recognized expert in this area, Mr. Levin will provide experienced and dependable assistance with E-1 or E-2 visa applications. 

  • E-1: If you are a national of a country that conducts a significant volume of trade with the U.S. (or if you intend to develop trade between the U.S. and your home country) you might be eligible for entry under an E-1 visa. 
  • E-2: The E-2 visa allows investors from treaty countries to enter the U.S. for purposes of directing and developing a business, with all the commitments and risks implicit in entrepreneurial activity. 
L-1

The L-1 visa category is for executives, managers or professionals employed by foreign affiliates of U.S companies. The L-1 visa is divided into two classifications:

  • L-1A Intracompany Transferee Executive or Manager
  • L-1B Intracompany Transferee Specialized Knowledge
H-1B

Many companies in the United States find themselves increasingly dependent on the talent, experience and energy of foreign national workers in professional, technical or specialized occupational fields. These employees typically enter the U.S. on nonimmigrant H-1B visas for “specialty occupations.” 

With extensive experience in business immigration, you can count on LPPC to guide your company or Human Resources department in preparing and filing an H-1B visa petition.

Green Card

Family preservation and reunification is a priority for our firm. Our attorneys have advised and assisted families from all over the world with entry visas, adjustment of status, and other immigration problems. 

  • Immediate Relatives: If you are the spouse, child, or parent of a U.S. citizen, we can help you obtain a green card through an Immediate Relative petition. 
  • Family-Based Preference: If your relative is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, we can assist you with your green card application through one of the family based preference categories.
Fiances

If you are a U.S. citizen and your fiancé/fiancée or spouse is overseas, our office will assist you to navigate the CIS requirements and regulations to have the case approved and then prepare you and your spouse for the interview at the U.S. Embassy. LPPC will also help you find the best ways to resolve any problems you encounter if a waiver is required in your case.

Marriage

Immigration through marriage is a common means of obtaining permanent residence in the U.S.  Since 1991, Philip Levin & Associates has helped hundreds of couples immigrate to the U.S. and build their lives together. 

  • I-130 Petition and Adjustment of Status: If you are married to a U.S. citizen, present in the U.S. and eligible to do so, our attorneys will assist you in preparing and filing the necessary I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application in the U.S.
  • Immigrant Visa Consular Processing: If you are married to a U.S. citizen and reside abroad, we will assist you in preparing and filing the IV petition with an Embassy or Consulate-General in your native country. 
  • I-751, Remove Conditions on Residence: If you have been married less than two years at the time your green card was initially approved, our office will help you in the joint petition process to become a permanent resident.