• Employers
    • Permanent Visas
      • PERM Labor Certifications
    • Temporary Visas
      • E-3 Visas
      • H-1B Employment
        • H-1B1 Visa
      • L-1 Visas
      • J-1 Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • TN, Canadian/Mexican
  • Employees
    • Nonimmigrant Visa Applications (Consular)
    • National Interest Waivers
  • Entrepreneurs
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
  • Compliance
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Family & Individuals
    • Marriage
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Naturalization
    • Students
      • STEM OPT Visas
  • About Us
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Attorneys
      • Philip M. Levin, Founder
      • Don L. Pangilinan, Principal
      • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
      • Alexandra Cotroneo, Associate

Levin and Pangilinan PC

U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law

¿Necesitas el sitio web en español?

800.974.2691
Contact Us
  • Employers
    • Permanent Visas
      • PERM Labor Certifications
    • Temporary Visas
      • E-3 Visas
      • H-1B Employment
        • H-1B1 Visa
      • L-1 Visas
      • J-1 Visas
      • O-1 Visas
      • TN, Canadian/Mexican
  • Employees
    • Nonimmigrant Visa Applications (Consular)
    • National Interest Waivers
  • Entrepreneurs
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
  • Compliance
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Family & Individuals
    • Marriage
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Naturalization
    • Students
      • STEM OPT Visas
  • About Us
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Attorneys
      • Philip M. Levin, Founder
      • Don L. Pangilinan, Principal
      • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
      • Alexandra Cotroneo, Associate

Attorney General Barr Holds That The Immigration And Nationality Act’s “Good Moral Character” Standard Requires Adherence To The Generally Accepted Moral Conventions Of The Community And That Criminal Activity Is Probative Of Non-Adherence To Such Conventions. Therefore, Evidence Of Two Or More Convictions For Driving Under The Influence During The Relevant Period Establishes A Presumption That One Lacks Good Moral Character Under INA §101(f). Because Only Those Who Possess Good Moral Character For A 10-Year Period Are Eligible For Cancellation Of Removal Per INA §240A(b), Such Evidence Presumptively Establishes That One’s Application For That Discretionary Relief Should Be Denied.

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On October 25, 2019, Attorney General (AG) William Barr issued a decision in a case previously decided by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board). On December 3, 2018, Acting AG Matthew Whitaker had directed the BIA to refer the case to him for review. As background, the Immigration Judge (IJ) had granted Respondent’s application for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(b), a form of relief that requires the applicant to show that removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his family and, among other things, that he had been a “person of good moral character” for the 10 years preceding the application – despite Respondent’s multiple convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) and other criminal history. On appeal, the Board vacated the IJ’s ruling and ordered Respondent removed to Mexico. Acting AG Whitaker subsequently directed the BIA to refer the matter to him, inviting the parties and interested amici to brief relevant issues, including the correct standard for assessing good moral character under the INA and the impact of multiple DUI convictions on whether one should be granted cancellation. Matter of Castillo-Perez 27 I&N Dec. 495 (A.G. 2018). AG Barr affirmed the Board’s order in this subsequent decision.  

In essence, the AG concluded that, when assessing good moral character under INA §101(f), evidence of two or more DUI convictions during the relevant period establishes a rebuttable presumption that a respondent lacked good moral character during that time. Because the IJ can only cancel removal for an applicant who has been a person of good moral character (GMC) during the 10-year period described in INA §240A(b), the AG held that such evidence also presumptively establishes that one is not eligible for this relief. In the instant case, found AG Barr, because the evidence of Respondent’s efforts to rehabilitate himself is insufficient to overcome this presumption, the BIA correctly overturned the IJ’s grant of cancellation of removal.

Early in his analysis, the AG noted that the INA does not specially define what “good moral character” is – but quite explicitly states what it is not. He then discussed INA §101(f), which provides 8 categories of persons who shall not be regarded as, or found to be, of GMC during the period for which GMC is required to be established; the provision’s so-called “catch-all clause”, stated AG Barr, means that one need not to be within any of the 8 classes listed to be found for other reasons not to be of good moral character.

The AG went on to describe Respondent’s extensive criminal record: arrested twice for assault and battery on his wife, charged with public drunkenness, convicted of negligent driving, and convicted of DUI in 2010 and 2012. Respondent stopped drinking and completed an alcohol-safety program after the 2nd DUI and, found AG Barr, still regularly attends Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. But DHS had initiated proceedings in 2010; Respondent applied for cancellation, which the IJ granted in 2016, concluding he had proven GMC. But the Board held Respondent had failed to establish that his removal would result in the requisite “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative. The BIA concluded that, in the alternative, Respondent had not demonstrated GMC and did not warrant relief in the exercise of discretion.

In this vein, AG Barr found that cancellation is “a coveted and scarce form of relief”, limited to 4000 applicants per year. He went on to note that multiple DUI conviction during the statutory period are strong evidence that one lacks GMC during that time and “is thus not eligible for cancellation of removal”. And, setting GMC aside, concluded the opinion, one with multiple DUI convictions would likely be denied cancellation as “a purely discretionary matter.” Although there is no inflexible standard regarding who should be granted relief as a matter of discretion, held the AG, the BIA has listed an array of factors to be considered in deciding whether to grant discretionary relief like cancellation; one’s criminal record – including its nature, recency, and seriousness – is a key factor and more serious misconduct weighs more heavily against the exercise of discretion than does less serious misconduct.

AG Barr went on to explain that multiple DUI convictions during the relevant period are “strong evidence” that one is not a person of GMC and is thus ineligible for cancellation. But he explicitly did not hold that such convictions are conclusive evidence; one might, he stated, prove that the convictions were an aberration and establish GMC. However, to do so, a respondent “must show that he had good moral character even during the period within which he committed the DUI offenses.” Thus, absent “substantial relevant and credible contrary evidence”, multiple DUI convictions require the IJ to deny cancellation. This rebuttable presumption, concluded the AG, similar to those regularly employed by the BIA, will serve to promote the consistent application of the immigration laws. Under these principles, the Board was right to hold that Respondent’s criminal record, along with his “longstanding alcohol abuse and negative immigration history” foreclosed his establishment of the GMC required for cancellation of removal. The BIA’s decision was therefore affirmed. Matter of Castillo-Perez, 27 I&N Dec.664 (A.G. 2019).

You have questions. We have answers.

Filed Under: Blog Tagged With: DUI, INA §240A(b), Moral Character

Contact Us

Recent Blog Posts

  • U.S. Visa Interview Waiver Program: Important 2025 Updates
  • New DOS Guidance on Mandating Social Media Review of all F-1, M-1, and J-1 visa applicants and Possible Revocations: What You Need to Know
  • H-1B LOTTERY FY 2026 AND THE RECENT MODERNIZATION RULE 
  • Birthright Citizenship Under Fire: Trump’s Latest Executive Order Explained
  • BIA Holds That Its Prior Holding In Matter Of Fernandes, 28 I&N Dec. 605 (BIA 2022), That An Objection To A Noncompliant Notice To Appear Will Generally Be Considered Timely If Raised Prior To The Close Of Pleadings Is Not A Change In Law, And Thus Matter Of Fernandes Applies Retroactively.

Practice Areas

  • Business Immigration
  • Family Immigration
  • Marriage
  • PERM Labor Certification
  • Hearing & Appeals
  • Deportation, Removal, Asylum
  • I-9/Worksite Enforcement

LEAVE A REVIEW

Leave a Review on Google

        

San Francisco Office
930 Montgomery Street
Suite 502
San Francisco, CA 94133

Silicon Valley Office
5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Los Angeles Office
445 S. Figueroa Street
Suites 2600 & 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071
©2025 Levin and Pangilinan PC. All Rights Reserved.
  • Business Immigration
  • Family Immigration
  • Labor Certification
  • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Hearings & Appeals
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · XML Sitemap · Sitemap

R-1
TN

The TN nonimmigrant classification allows qualified Canadian and Mexican citizens to enter the U.S. and engage in professional business activities. LPPC will help you navigate through the TN application process by evaluating your eligibility, preparing supporting documentation for your application, and ultimately filing your application. 

B-1

LPPC will guide you through the consular process to receive a B-1 visa for specific short-term business purposes ranging from contract negotiations to seminars and conferences.

O-1

O-1 visas are for persons of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business or sports. 

J-1

Administered by the Department of State, the J-1 visa is for students, trainees, academics, researchers, professionals or experts participating in an approved Exchange Visitor program. LPPC will assist you and your sponsor with preparing the necessary paperwork and the consular process so you can begin your program at ease. 

E-1 & E-2

E-1 visas and E-2 visas are for nationals of countries with which the United States has a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation (FCN) or bilateral investment treaty (BIT). If you are a nonimmigrant trader or investor seeking to conduct business operations or develop a new enterprise in the U.S., we will help you file for the appropriate visa. As a recognized expert in this area, Mr. Levin will provide experienced and dependable assistance with E-1 or E-2 visa applications. 

  • E-1: If you are a national of a country that conducts a significant volume of trade with the U.S. (or if you intend to develop trade between the U.S. and your home country) you might be eligible for entry under an E-1 visa. 
  • E-2: The E-2 visa allows investors from treaty countries to enter the U.S. for purposes of directing and developing a business, with all the commitments and risks implicit in entrepreneurial activity. 
L-1

The L-1 visa category is for executives, managers or professionals employed by foreign affiliates of U.S companies. The L-1 visa is divided into two classifications:

  • L-1A Intracompany Transferee Executive or Manager
  • L-1B Intracompany Transferee Specialized Knowledge
H-1B

Many companies in the United States find themselves increasingly dependent on the talent, experience and energy of foreign national workers in professional, technical or specialized occupational fields. These employees typically enter the U.S. on nonimmigrant H-1B visas for “specialty occupations.” 

With extensive experience in business immigration, you can count on LPPC to guide your company or Human Resources department in preparing and filing an H-1B visa petition.

Green Card

Family preservation and reunification is a priority for our firm. Our attorneys have advised and assisted families from all over the world with entry visas, adjustment of status, and other immigration problems. 

  • Immediate Relatives: If you are the spouse, child, or parent of a U.S. citizen, we can help you obtain a green card through an Immediate Relative petition. 
  • Family-Based Preference: If your relative is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, we can assist you with your green card application through one of the family based preference categories.
Fiances

If you are a U.S. citizen and your fiancé/fiancée or spouse is overseas, our office will assist you to navigate the CIS requirements and regulations to have the case approved and then prepare you and your spouse for the interview at the U.S. Embassy. LPPC will also help you find the best ways to resolve any problems you encounter if a waiver is required in your case.

Marriage

Immigration through marriage is a common means of obtaining permanent residence in the U.S.  Since 1991, Philip Levin & Associates has helped hundreds of couples immigrate to the U.S. and build their lives together. 

  • I-130 Petition and Adjustment of Status: If you are married to a U.S. citizen, present in the U.S. and eligible to do so, our attorneys will assist you in preparing and filing the necessary I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application in the U.S.
  • Immigrant Visa Consular Processing: If you are married to a U.S. citizen and reside abroad, we will assist you in preparing and filing the IV petition with an Embassy or Consulate-General in your native country. 
  • I-751, Remove Conditions on Residence: If you have been married less than two years at the time your green card was initially approved, our office will help you in the joint petition process to become a permanent resident.